A verdict,
not an opinion.
Quorum sends your document to a panel of adversarial reviewer personas across Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. It comes back as one consensus verdict — with every vote, dissent, and rationale on the record.
ONE FREE REVIEW DAILY · NO CREDIT CARD REQUIREDEvery vote on the record
Verdicts link back to each reviewer's vote and rationale. Dissents are preserved, never averaged away.
Personas argue the room
Each reviewer takes a role your real readers will — counsel, advocate, analyst — and reads to find fault.
Agreement that means something
Deep reviews spread the panel across Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. When they agree, it isn't one model grading itself.
Bring the whole document to the panel.
Create an account and submit one focused Quick review each day for free. Buy credits for larger panels, longer documents, and Deep mode.
Create an accountThe three things everyone asks
“AI hallucinates.”
One model does. That's why nothing reaches the consensus section unless two or more reviewers raised it independently — and unreplicated findings are quarantined under Verify, labeled as exactly what they are.
“It's not really a panel.”
Each reviewer reads alone — its own persona, its own priorities, in deep mode its own model — and votes blind. The disagreement you see in Contested is real disagreement, kept on the record.
“I'll just send the doc and find out.”
You can. But the first hard question, the weakest claim, and the clause opposing counsel will drive a truck through are cheaper to hear here, three minutes before you hit send, than out there.